Pennsylvania Cpa Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
815449140
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2154969272
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$840,559
Expenses
$910,820
Assets
$3,782,067
Liabilities
$389,821

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER CRYDER CPA MBA (CEO, TREASURER)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER CRYDER CPA MBA (CEO, TREASURER): $462,535 total reported compensation
  • ADAM BATCHELOR (SECRETARY): $291,381 total reported compensation
  • KYLE BICKHART CPA (CFO - AS OF JUL 2024): $160,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Pennsylvania cpa foundation's mission is to inspire young people to pursue careers in accounting and to provide educational, motivational, and financial support to those working to attain the certified public accountant (cpa) credential.

What it reported doing in 2024

Cpas work in a myriad of businesses and possess a broad spectrum of skills and knowledge. Studies show that young people who are exposed to, and influenced by, cpas are more likely to consider an accounting career. The Pennsylvania cpa foundation provides opportunities for students to learn about career options available to them when they choose to pursue an accounting degree. In addition, the Pennsylvania cpa foundation provides financial, educational, and career guidance.a record number of students have chosen accounting as a major in recent years, many are not becoming cpas. This has created a talent gap in accounting firms of all sizes. Leaders of the profession continue to cite talent acquisition and retention as their most critical challenge. The path to become a cpa is not an easy one. But with the right financial, educational, and motivational support, the journey can be less onerous. The Pennsylvania cpa foundation works to deliver that through cpa exam and licensing information, updates to the cpa exam, cpa exam scholarship and awareness programing.while many of the Pennsylvania cpa foundation's programs reach and support disadvantaged students among prospective cpas, studies have shown that aspiring cpas from challenging backgrounds tend to have additional socioeconomic challenges, and their likelihood of success in passing the cpa exam and becoming licensed is much lower. That is why the Pennsylvania cpa foundation developed additional programs targeting these groups, and the employers who will hire them. Surveys show that firms and other employers continue to struggle to find talent.to inspire students to consider an accounting career, the foundation connected with over 11,000 high school and college students and educators through its accounting career discovery, accounting opportunities experience, and accounting career days. During these events, students learned more about careers in accounting through presentations by cpas who work in public accounting, corporate finance, government, and education, and students who are currently pursuing an accounting degree with the intent on becoming a cpa. Per our career days, high school students reported a 21% increase in interest in majoring in accounting compared with before the event. More than 88% of student attendees completed the program with a positive view of accounting. To provide financial assistance to those pursuing an accounting career, the foundation awarded $125,000 in scholarships to 122 high school and college students. To further support aspiring cpas, an additional $13,000 was awarded to 13 cpa exam candidates to help cover the cost of the exam fees and review course fees. The foundation continued to provide student support and resources through the student ambassador program on Pennsylvania college and university campuses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $80.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.15; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $793K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $463K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.