Pennsylvania Association of Hazardous Materials Technicians Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300644755
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Greensburg, PA, USA
Phone
7247879075
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,896
Expenses
$82,177
Assets
$24,259

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK CASTIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL TAYLOR (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HEATHER GULSBY-STEINER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARK CASTIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL TAYLOR (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HEATHER GULSBY-STEINER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a representative and coordinated voice for pennsylvanias hazardous materials responders

What it reported doing in 2025

To provide a representative & coordinated voice for pennsylvanias hazardous materials responders; to provide in the facilitation of the hazardous materials response team certification process; to interface with other state, regional, & national organizations with interest in the hazardous materials response field; to promote uniformity & standardazation of hazardous materials operations, equipment, training & certification on both a regional & state-wide basis; and to provide for the sharing of resources & provide for the ability to make joint purchases of hazardous materials supplies, equipment & training

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.6%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.6% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $79K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.