Pennsylvania Association for Behavioral Healthcare

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232076360
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Harrisburg, PA, USA
Phone
7172374804
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$31,003
Expenses
$11,377
Assets
$68,518
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NEIL CALLAHAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • NEIL CALLAHAN (PRESIDENT)
  • LAURA LONGSTREET (FIRST VP & TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's primary exempt purpose is the promotion of care and treatment for the mentally ill by licensed private healthcare facilities.

What it reported doing in 2021

Engaging counsel to monitor and inform the organization of proposed legislation, regulatory policies and directives regarding the provision of services to the mentally ill. Also, the sharing of information through monthly meetings in order to establish goals and objectives and increase the quality of provision of mental health services in licensed private facilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.7%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.02; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -47.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 32.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.