Pennsylvania Aggregates and Concrete Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232193048
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Harrisburg, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172342603
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,634,890
- Expenses
- $2,523,482
- Assets
- $1,948,793
- Liabilities
- $372,514
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER VLAHOS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PETER VLAHOS (PRESIDENT): $272,489 total reported compensation
- JIM CASILIO (DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SERVICES): $174,145 total reported compensation
- KENNETH CRANK (DIRECTOR OF CERTIFICATIONS): $157,352 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Paca safeguards the aggregates, ready mixed concrete and cement industries from common threats; expands market opportunities; trains a productive workforce; educates and communicates the value of construction materials to all pennsylvanians; serves as the gathering place for industry stakeholders; and, unites divergent interests into a shared platform for action to benefit the aggregates, ready mixed concrete and cement industries in Pennsylvania
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization held in excess of 100 events over the year attracting more than 3,000 individuals that are either engaged in the aggregates, concrete & cement industries in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania or are users of the products ofered by the industry. The organization distributed on a statewide basis marketing and research materials created by the national organizations serving these same markets (national stone, sand, and gravel association for the aggregates industry; national ready mixed concrete association for the concrete industry). The organization continues to foster dialogue with state agencies advocating industry positions.such programs through committees, task forces, and such are extremely difficult to measure in terms of actual return and benefit to the industry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 34.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $272K · 31 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.