Pennington Dance Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
421631061
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
West Hollywood, CA, USA
Phone
3236638809
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,548
Expenses
$75,201
Assets
$46,601
Liabilities
$3,007

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JOHN PENNINGTON (DIRECTOR, CH)
  • DAVID OLSEN (DIRECTOR, PR)
  • JOHN GRAY (DIRECTOR, TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The pennington dance group (referred to as pdg) fosters the love of dance through educational outreach activities, performances, and free dance related events offered to the community.

What it reported doing in 2025

1) pdg presented the fifth concert in its annual series titled "foothills dance makers", joining three other non-profit dance companies to showcase the talent of local dancers and choreographers in the los angeles region. Pdg contributed repertory works and new reconstructions of historic pieces. 2) pdg was selected to open the 2025 season of dance at the brand library and art gallery in glendale, California in may. The free-admission concert was attended by over 250 people. 3) pdg presented its first concerts celebrating the company's 25th anniversary at its home venue, arc pasadena. The november concerts were sold out and featured repertory spanning the full 25-year history of the company. 4) in collaboration with england's yorke dance project (ydp), pdg spent two weeks in august reconstructing and setting a lewitzky work on ydp's company. Ydp performed the work on its fall tour. 5) artistic director john pennington was invited to deliver a guest lecture at oxford university (uk) on historic dance reconstructions, as part of the dansox series in august. The presentation included a live demonstration of two historic works and a technique training session. 6)pdg is an official partner with the city of pasadena as a presenter of artnight. In october 2025, pdg performed and presented additional dance artists at this free public event, which was attended by over 600 people. 7) pdg's artistic director served as guest artist at el camino college, teaching two classes and a workshop on injury prevention for the american college dance association. 8) pdg offers weekly modern dance technique classes open to the public at a substantially below-market rate of 10 for a two-hour session. Pdg also offers short-term class blocks and workshops led by visiting artists, likewise priced below market rate. 9) pdg makes its home studio and theater space available for rental to local dance and performing arts groups at reduced rates, encouraging and promoting the growth and visibility of other non-profit and emerging dance organizations in the community. 10) through pdg's social media platforms and email communications, an estimated 700 or more individuals per month have engaged with content related to pdg performances, history, and current events. Total attendance / participation (items 1-5): over 2,500 people attended or participated in pdg events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -28.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $67K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.