Penn State Rugby Alumni Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251601169
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- State College, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8142388474
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,004
- Expenses
- $75,172
- Assets
- $215,213
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH PULLARA (PRESIDENT)
- KEITH FITZPATRICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOSEPH PULLARA (PRESIDENT)
- KEITH FITZPATRICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRANDON ZLUPKO (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purposes of the penn state rugby alumni club, inc. Are to support the development of amateur rugby student-atheletes for national and international competition, and serve the membership by providing effective communications and worthwhile events. Our vision is to make penn state university a premier rugby university in the U.S.a by producing national championship-caliber teams and providing support, networks, and opportunities that will develop successful students into leaders of tomorrow - all within the administrative guidelines of psu's intercollegiate athletics, including close coordination with the office of the coordinator of team sports and the director of rugby.
What it reported doing in 2024
Funding to the team sports department of psu to offset the costs of the men's and women's rugby programs at penn state. Supports travel, equipment, staffing, and program development and well as field and practice.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 72% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.86; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.