Peninsula Music Festival Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391691920
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Ephraim, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9208544060
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,080,820
- Expenses
- $1,108,565
- Assets
- $396,763
- Liabilities
- $255,093
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- LISA HARPER (DIRECTOR): $69,231 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The peninsula music festival, inc. Is committed to producing world-class performances realized through the presentation of the recital series, a chamber music series, and the symphony series in addition to the promotion of music appreciation, and education throughout door county, Wisconsin.
What it reported doing in 2024
The peninsula music festival, inc. (pmf) finances and produces world-class performances realized through the presentation of the recital series, a chamber music series, and the symphony series in door county, wi. Pmf presents broad repertoire, promotes young artists, and the appreciation of great music. Pmf was founded in 1953 by lorenz heise, kay wilson, and thor johnson who was inspired by the early moravian music festival. Currently in its 73rd season, the 90-member festival orchestra is comprised of professional musicians who represent leading symphonic and operatic institutions around the world, including those of montreal, toronto, boston, houston, st. Louis, milwaukee, omaha, pittsburgh, houston grand opera, the dallas opera and lyric opera of chicago. The festival presents a nine-concert symphony series every august, with year-round programming that includes recital series concerts, chamber music performances, and special concert events that feature members of the festival orchestra and other renowned artists. Each symphony series concert features a guest artist of national or international stature, and the festival orchestra is the only professional orchestra in northeast Wisconsin. Over 6,000 patrons attend the nine-concert symphony series every summer. In the last 30 years, the operating budget has grown substantially, and the endowment has grown from $450,000 to $6.5 million over the last 20 years. The conservative strategy set by the trustees focuses long-term stability rather than quick growth, which as a strategy has been very successful. Pmf prides itself on the high artistic quality of the orchestra and continuing to operate with low administrative overhead. The endowment has continued to grow through strong, stable investments and additional contributions. Pmf awards college scholarships each year and numerous summer music study grants to encourage music students to attend summer camps and study privately. This was the tenth year of the festival's $10 student/children ticket program. Pmf's year-round programming helps to elevate the festival's brand, increase visibility, and remain relevant to those on the peninsula and beyond. The emerging conductor program provides well-rounded training and exposure to aspiring conductors with a professional symphony orchestra and continues as part of the festival's educational outreach activities.the pmf sustaining committee (pmf's volunteer society) continues to serve as the backbone of the organization. Volunteers provide thousands of hours of service to the organization by picking up guest artists from the airport, chauffeuring to/from engagement related activities/rehearsals and performances, providing food for musicians, and working as ushers and parking attendants for the concerts. For evaluation purposes, the pmf currently uses a three-phase evaluation system set forth by the league of american orchestras. The components include: administrative - organizational structure, board, staff and volunteers as well as marketing and development; financial - planning and reporting; and artistic - repertoire, operations and professional development. Pmf continues to achieve its goals and fulfill its mission thanks to a strong board of directors, a well-trained administrative staff, and a great core of volunteers. This trio has provided the financial resources for the pmf to grow where it counts - in the quality of its artistic product and its outreach to the people in the community that it serves.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $940K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.