Peninsula Community Health Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943079770
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bremerton, WA, USA
Phone
3603773776
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,949,847
Expenses
$60,735,827
Assets
$96,632,298
Liabilities
$28,463,208

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

30 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EVELYN HETRICK (PRESIDENT)
  • AL PINKHAM (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER KREIDLER-MOSS PHARMD (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER KREIDLER-MOSS PHARMD (CEO): $464,658 total reported compensation
  • REGINA BONNEVIE ROGERS MD (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $420,302 total reported compensation
  • DONNAVILLE ORTIZ MD (PHYSICIAN): $346,945 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pchs exemplifies a culture of community service.

What it reported doing in 2024

Behavioral health - during 2024, pchs provided 18,421 behavioral health and sud encounters to 4,724 patients at twenty-four clinical sites located in bremerton (ten sites), belfair (two sites), key peninsula, kingston (two sites), port orchard (three sites), poulsbo (two sites), and silverdale (four sites) as well as three mobile sites. By focusing on a patient's behavioral health as part of an integrated care model, we are able to better coordinate complete and timely access to care. Our licensed, certified counselors and substance use disorder professionals address the individualized needs of our patients by working alongside our primary care providers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 58
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.2%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 79.5%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.2% of revenue deployed · 79.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $48.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $465K · 30 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10.5M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.