Pellettieri Stone Carvers Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474233533
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6462296418
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,459
- Expenses
- $72,697
- Assets
- $101,844
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chris Pellettieri (Executive Director and Treasurer)
People named in this filing
- Norman Stiles (Secretary)
- Chris Pellettieri (Executive Director and Treasurer)
- Morgan Dummit (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Pellettieri Stone Carvers' Academy is dedicated to offering training in the traditional techniques of stone carving and promoting awareness and appreciation of stone carving.
What it reported doing in 2025
Academy for Teachers - A two-day program to introduce NYC teachers to traditional stone carving as part of the Academy of Teachers program to honor and support teachers through world-class learning experiences that inspire them to continue changing lives, in the classroom and beyond. # persons benefitted - 12
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.3%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 53.6%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.3%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.4; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 31.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.3% of revenue deployed · 53.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $39K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.