Pegasus Therapeutic Riding Center of Coachella Valley

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953774003
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Desert Hot Springs, CA, USA
Phone
7607723057
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$307,891
Expenses
$461,657
Assets
$575,812
Liabilities
$160,113

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Andrew Andy Dye (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jennifer Heggie (Executive Dir.): $93,222 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Elevating the capabilities of kids and adults with disabilities through therapeutic horseback riding.

What it reported doing in 2024

Pegasus Therapeutic Riding is a place where children and adults of all ages and with all types of disabilities can come for a full range of motion exercise on horseback, equine assisted therapy. The walking motion of the horse's body, against human legs, massages all the muscles used in the human walk, and is an inspiring and exciting experience for those whose life is spent in a wheelchair or with disabilities. Each rider is gently eased into a program of physical exercise geared to their needs. Immobility causes good muscles to atrophy which leads to further problems for a disabled person. At Pegasus, we try to strengthen the muscles and joints with these exercises along with the effort required in mounting, dismounting and riding a horse. Our program offers psychological and emotional benefits such as learning to concentrate, the discipline of following directions and a sense of accomplishment at being able to steer a large animal. Most autistics have difficulty bonding with people, a short attention span and most do not communicate. At Pegasus autistics are able to bond with an animal and volunteers, developing trust and confidence. In the riding arena many of them are suddenly attentive and some have found ways to communicate. Riders feel a sense of accomplishment by achieving certain goals. The interaction with the volunteers and the horse also help the riders socializing skills. At Pegasus we look to the ABILITY of a person rather than the DISABILITY. At Pegasus, we believe everyone is worthy and we know that MIRACLES DO HAPPEN, we see them every time we take a person out of a wheelchair and put them on a horse. About Our Clients: Riders/Clients come from the Coachella Valleys Unified School Districts special needs classes. Pegasus pays to bus these riders to and from our facility during the week. Other riders/clients are referred from Angel View Crippled Children's Foundation, Desert Arc, Autism Association, and ACT for MS. We also have classes for preschool and home school children, and we get referrals from Loma Linda and private practice doctors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.9%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 55.1%; rating input score 55
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -49.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.2%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.9% of revenue deployed · 55.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $254K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $93K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.