Pediatrics Plus Community Connections
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203887117
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Conway, AR, USA
- Phone
- 5013295459
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $953,063
- Expenses
- $698,415
- Assets
- $1,293,376
- Liabilities
- $4,061
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TODD AMY DENTON (PRESIDENT & V PRES)
People named in this filing
- TODD AMY DENTON (PRESIDENT & V PRES)
- DAVID KRISTA TAPP (SECRETARY)
- BENTLEY SYDNEY BLACKMON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pediatrics plus community connections was organized as a non-profit organization to improve the lives of children in the central Arkansas community by addressing various social and developmental needs not able to be funded through insurance, state and federal program nor private pay programs. The organization's primary programs address such issues as childhood obesity, social skill development through performing arts and family based therapy for children diagnosed with autism.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community connections created several Texas programs to provide extra-curricular activities for children with disabilities and support for their families. Community connections expanded its recreational activities and developed a support system for the children and families of north Texas. These include acts jr., sport clinic and art camp.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.3%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 31%; rating input score 31
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.7%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.85; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.3% of revenue deployed · 31% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $216K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.