Pediatric Stroke Warriors

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474308118
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Renton, WA, USA
Phone
2067551317
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Heart and Circulatory System Diseases, Disorders

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,224
Expenses
$221,705
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kaysee Hyatt (Executive Director)
  • Lyndsey Watson (President)
  • Alisa Bacon-Sullivan (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kaysee Hyatt (Executive Director)
  • Lyndsey Watson (President)
  • Alisa Bacon-Sullivan (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

(1) educating and bringing awareness to individuals and communities about pediatric stroke including symptoms, causes, effects, and therapies. (2) to provide relief to children and families affected by pediatric stroke through the provision of support, education, and other resources. (3) to promote and support research and treatment options for children suffering from the effects of a pediatric stroke.

What it reported doing in 2020

Helping Hands Therapy Grant Program - Early and ongoing therapies and supportive services have been proven most effective for children impacted by stroke. Some families have limited insurance coverage for some therapies and limited resources to cover the cost. PSW provides a grant program to help families fund these therapies and supportive services so that the child can receive the care he or she needs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 92% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 5
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 77.2%; rating input score 77

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -280.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 63.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $171K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.