Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920252695
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Albany, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3144546120
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neurology, Neuroscience Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,350
- Expenses
- $60,765
- Assets
- $124,989
- Liabilities
- $11,058
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Sandra Buttram PhoenixGenlHosp (Chairman)
- Jennifer Munoz Pareja Miami U (Secretary/Treas)
- Sue Hong JohnHopkinsHosp (Sec/Treas)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advancing knowledge to optimize neurologic outcomes for critically ill children by performing clinical and pre-clinical studies, supporting education, developing and promoting best practices for pediatric neurocritical care, and fostering advocacy
What it reported doing in 2025
Hosted webinars & research discussion forums with members throughout the yearEngaged with early-career members by hosting meetings to present the latest scientific research & advancement opportunities in pediatric neurocritical careOrganized two meetings of members in Denver and Montreal to collaborate on research and discuss outcomesDeveloped a process for evaluating guidelines statements from other pediatric care organizationsForged strategic partnerships with industry groups
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.3%; rating input score 46
- Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37.6%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.06; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.3% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $45K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.