Pediatric Education Foundation of Virginia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010705982
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Charlottesville, VA, USA
Phone
8668545322
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Reported finances

Revenue
$265
Expenses
$933
Assets
$8,748
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL MARTIN MD (DIRECTOR)
  • SANDY CHUNG MD (MEDICAL DIRECTOR)
  • NATASHA SRIRAMAN MD (OFFICER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate, support, & promote the health and well-being of children

What it reported doing in 2024

Cigna has approved pediatric education foundation of Virginia a sponsorship in the amount of usd 5,000.00 for vmap social determinants of heatlh resources outreach. At cigna, everything we do is driven by a simple mission: to improve the health, well-being and peace of mind of those we serve. That means investing in important efforts that help individuals get healthier and help communities get stronger.we are proud to sponsor vmaa social determinants of health resources outreach, and are pleased to be able to contribute to its success. This money is to support vmap and bridges2resources marketing and awareness to the western and southwestern regions of vmap. Focusing on the lynchburg, charlottesville, roanoke and other counties around those areas will be important.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -252.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.38; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $933 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.