PED - Prevention Education & Development

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911845556
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Spokane, WA, USA
Phone
5093261471
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,278
Expenses
$21,056
Assets
$1,345

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Carole Brown (President)
  • Judy Lanphear (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Adam Borgman (Director)
  • Barbara Fillmore (Director)
  • Rob Fraser (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

PED is a nonprofit pro-active organization dedicated to promoting successfull aging. It creates, develops, and promotes senior wellness programs and projects in collaboration with like-minded individuals, organizations, and businesses.Physical activity, intellectual challenge, emotional fulfillment, and spiritual enrichment are the foundations of successful ageing. Regular exercise, proper nutrition, health monitoring, involvement in "growth opportunities", and a "giving" lifestyle are bridges to these foundations.

What it reported doing in 2014

WALKING CHALLENGE - A program to encourage different aging and retirement centers to involve their residents in a friendly competition with other centers in a challenge to walk the most miles with the ultimate purpose of promoting physical fitness and competition and to recognize seniors for their accomplishments in this regard.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.9%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -32.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -57% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.9% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $19K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.