Peanutbutterpigs Guinea Pig Rescue

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992093880
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Angleton, TX, USA
Phone
7138593004
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,729
Expenses
$9,612
Assets
$5,488
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lillian Contreras (President)
  • Pamela Contreras (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Lillian Contreras (President)
  • Pamela Contreras (Vice-President)
  • Crystal Medrano (Member at Large)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

PeanutButterPigs Guinea Pig Rescue is a Animal Welfare Organization Focusing on the rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption of guinea pigs abandoned or surrendered in Houston, Texas and the greater area.

What it reported doing in 2025

In our first year, PeanutButterPigs Guinea Pig Rescue officially began our service of rescuing, rehabilitating & finding homes for guinea pigs that have been abandoned or surrendered. Our Rescue accepted 44 guinea pigs in 2024. After getting them treatment to ensure their health and socializing them to be ready for their families, our rescue successfully adopted out 36! With three staying with our rescue as sanctuary animals, two going into the care of our foster & three entering 2025 still looking for forever homes. Our rescue took in two extreme medical cases in 2024. We successfully provided both the medical care they needed, with Dolly's life-threatening tumor being removed successfully and being placed in her forever home & Oreo getting the diagnosis he needed to begin the journey of his treatment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.