Peach State Starbase Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463031386
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Marietta, GA, USA
Phone
6785693565
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,000
Expenses
$17,040
Assets
$14,215
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN MCKAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CAREN BAUMANN (PRESIDENT/CEO)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN MCKAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CAREN BAUMANN (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • DR TRICIA PATTERSON (TREASURER/CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support the department of defense's starbase operation at dobbins air force base.

What it reported doing in 2020

The foundation identifies appropriate donation sources, promotes interest in and provides a channel for monetary or other material support for starbase. A secondary activity of the foundation is to identify and prioritize schools attending starbase who lack sufficient transportation funding, the only direct expense to these schools for such attendance, and work with the administration and/or foundation boards of such schools to appropriate partial, whole or matching funds for this sole specific purpose. The foundation also provides indirect support of starbase by providing financial and logistical support of starbase staff, through the Georgia department of defense, as authorized and permitted by laws of the state of Georgia and Georgia department of defense regulations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.8%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.