Peach State Learning Solutions Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841867478
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6467250791
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,696,447
- Expenses
- $5,563,644
- Assets
- $4,066,915
- Liabilities
- $2,502,378
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Joseph Cortes (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Nakia McCall (Head of School): $146,349 total reported compensation
- Joseph Cortes (Executive Director): $73,213 total reported compensation
- Erika Ellison (Chief Financial Officer): $17,083 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the academy is to empower all students to contribute positively to the communities in which they live by preparing them for high-demand careers that are relevant in Georgia.
What it reported doing in 2024
Destinations Career Academy of Georgia (the "Academy") is a not-for-profit organization organized under the laws of the State of Georgia. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, the Academy was approved to provide educational services to students from sixth through twelfth grade. The mission of the Academy is to empower all students to contribute positively to the communities in which they live by preparing them for high-demand careers that are relevant in Georgia. The Academy is located in Atlanta, Georgia providing education for over 350 students in school year 2024-2025. The Academy was closed effective June 30, 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 55.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 47.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 49.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.2% of revenue deployed · 85.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 8 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.4M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.