Peacemakers Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752172659
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
2148841229
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Humanities Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,137
Expenses
$19,271
Assets
$11,791
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Len Ellis (President)
  • Anita Marcos (Co-President Elect)
  • Sandra Spencer (Co-President Elect)
  • Gae Hatton (Executive Director (Jan thru Mar, 2014))

People named in this filing

  • Len Ellis (President)
  • Anita Marcos (Co-President Elect)
  • Sandra Spencer (Co-President Elect)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Peacemakers Incorporated presents conferences, seminars, workshops and other events and collaborates with other peace organizations and educational institutions for the purpose of promoting and delivering peace education to empower peacemakers locally and globally with an emphasis on women.

What it reported doing in 2014

Throughout 2014 Peacemakers Incorporated continued to publicize the UNT Castleberry Peace Institute: The Castleberry Peace Institute was created in October 2008 by Peacemakers Incorporated, adopted by the College of Arts and Sciences of University of North Texas in 2009, and established as UNT Castleberry Peace Institute in 2010. The Castleberry Peace Insitute at UNT, will increasingly provide peace education at the university level through classes, seminars, lectures, conferences, research, fellowships, scholarships, internships and other peace study programs to benefit the UNT community, the North Texas area, the nation, and the international community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33.9%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -51.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -35.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.