Peacekeeper Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473686988
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Yakima, WA, USA
Phone
5098641446
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$651,139
Expenses
$782,159
Assets
$180,147
Liabilities
$62,588

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lucy Smartlowit (Interim Executive Director)
  • Xuxuxyay Raven (Executive Director)
  • Steve Rigdon (President)
  • Mike Sequaptewa (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Lucy Smartlowit (Interim Executive Director): $71,146 total reported compensation
  • Xuxuxyay Raven (Executive Director): $28,333 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Peacekeeper Society's mission is to provide life-changing opportunities for indigenous people.

What it reported doing in 2022

Emergency Response Program - In its fourth year of service, the Peacekeeper Society is on the front lines of the Covid-19 crisis distributing emergency supplies (sanitizer, masks, PPE's, and gloves), food, water, and cleaning supplies to Tribal members in need throughout the Northwest Pacific Region. We distribute and deliver an average of 10,000 lbs. of food and supplies each week. The Peacekeeper Society is working tirelessly to protect elders, mothers, small children in kinship care, and vulnerable families. Grief Recovery Program - This program uses a grief recovery best practices model that incorporates a Trauma-Informed Care approach for healing from any type of loss, such as death, employment, divorce, separation, and the debilitating impact from the loss of health. Our program is an action-oriented plan that uses experiential group activities along with reading and writing assignments to help Tribal members to reclaim their lives. This program provides 8-week Grief Recovery Support Groups and one-on-one individual counseling sessions to Tribal families and organizations throughout the year. Traditional Food Program - Our Yakama people still maintain a strong hunting, gathering, and fishing culture. This program enhances that lifestyle by teaching community members how to properly harvest and process wild foods using modern and traditional methods. It is facilitated by a team of certified Master Food Preservers who are also hunters, gatherers, and fishermen/women. The goal is to teach families how to safely preserve food and stock their pantries with deer, elk, buffalo, salmon, berries, and roots.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 44
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.2%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 43.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 40.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.2% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $625K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $71K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.