Peace Village Projects Inc C/o Gonzalez & Associates Pc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043265503
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Stoughton, MA, USA
Phone
8028643346
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
International Peace and Security

Reported finances

Expenses
$2,824
Assets
$14,365

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANET R KAHN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JANET R KAHN (PRESIDENT)
  • ROSE A GOWDEY (TREASURER)
  • SUE PURCHON (CLERK)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote peace through non-violent conflict resolution methods.

What it reported doing in 2024

The mission of peace village projects to develop share both formal and non-formal means of encouraging the consciousness of peace, the habits of peace and the social infrastructure that supports peace. We do this by drawing on the oldest and newest sources of wisdom, from cherokee and buddhist teachings, to the worldview of quantum physics and the growing contemporary literature on conflict resolution. Over the years peace village projects has developed curricula for both elementary (peace village classroom) and middle school (shaping a better world) grades. We have worked with israelis and palestinians in collaboration with the israel/palestine center for research and information (ipcri) and the institute for multi-track diplomacy. Our current work is focused on the inter-relationship of human and planetary well-being.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 14
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 36.3%; rating input score 36

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.09; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.