Peace Village Posters 4 Peace
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200079223
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Phone
- 5139192538
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $335,014
- Expenses
- $328,495
- Assets
- $60,199
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Steve Sunderland (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Steve Sunderland (Executive Director): $39,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Peace Village is an educational organization dedicated to projects that increase peace through compassionate actions, words, arts and partnerships. Our key educational focus is to provide material and staff to educate people about their health care.
What it reported doing in 2024
CANCER JUSTICE NETWORK - CJN actively seeks HEALTH JUSTICE FOR ALL to improve health through preventative education and access to critical exams for cancer and other health issues in Cincinnati. Coordinating the services and resources of over 20 Partner Agencies, we are heavily focused on cancer-related health concerns among low-income and minority community members through early screening and timely treatment. In 2024, CJN had 12 Community Navigators who are trained health educators who work to reduce barriers to cancer care, connecting people with educational services aimed at the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Having noted transportation as a major obstacle in cancer detection and treatment in these communities, we identify and coordinate available transportation to and from cancer-related and all medical appointments through the use of a grant OKI Regional Council of Governments, Congregation of St. Joseph, Human Foundation Institute, Christ Church Cathedral and individual donors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.2% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $282K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $40K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.