Peace Through Action USA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475665023
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2028275967
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $455,633
- Expenses
- $221,695
- Assets
- $504,237
- Liabilities
- $456,896
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Reeg (Director, Secretary, Chief Executive Officer)
Highest reported compensation
- Robert Reeg (Director, Secretary, Chief Executive Officer): $49,692 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Peace Through Action USA inspires and equips everyday people to increase safety, belonging, and peace in their relationships and communities by cultivating their compassion and increasing their constructive communication and conflict resolution skills. We accomplish our mission by producing events and resources for exploring civic and social concerns, promoting examples of inspiring community peacebuilders, encouraging spiritual self-care and anchoring, teaching practical peace skills, supporting personal and small group action planning for peace, bolstering community peacebuilding efforts, and advocating for a socially just society. The breadth of our mission activities situates us in the peacebuilding, public health, public safety, social health, youth development, adult learning, volunteerism and service, civic engagement, and civil and human rights fields of the U.S. social sector.
What it reported doing in 2025
Peace Accelerators -- We commenced our Peace Accelerators program, which strengthens people's ability to increase peace in their relationships and communities by building peace skills together, making action plans for change, and discovering resources that support social well-being. This program includes three activities: Essential Peace Skills Trainings-intensive learning experiences focused on core communication and conflict resolution skills that people can apply across many social contexts. Participants learn, practice, and reflect through realistic scenarios; Practical Peace Solutions Sessions-brief workshops that demonstrate how constructive communication and conflict resolution skills work in real-life situations. Participants learn core techniques and practice them through structured role-plays and scenarios; and Peace Through Action Meet-Ups-small-group gatherings that guide participants through action planning and discovery of social well-being resources. Participants leave with concrete steps to increase peace in their relationships and communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 26.3%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 54%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: $72.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.27; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.91; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 33.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 39.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 39% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 26.3% of revenue deployed · 54% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $120K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $50K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.