Peace Rising Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824778070
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Somerville, MA, USA
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,177
- Expenses
- $92,384
- Assets
- $47,506
- Liabilities
- $20,812
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- Amber Houghstow (Director)
- Adam Hasz (Secretary)
- Daniel Tatar (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We identify locations around the world that are most vulnerable to broader social impacts of climate change such as migration, instability, and conflict. From there, we conduct research to understand why these vulnerabilities exist--such as expected climate impacts combined with lack of infrastructure, extractive policies, underinvestment in communities, and other factors. Then we engage with community organizations and policymakers to effect structural changes that support and protect those communities.
What it reported doing in 2020
Alongside our direct impact work, we continue to conduct research in support of future program development. This year, these areas of research included a) performing a systems analysis examining root causes of the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar and its associated refugee crisis together with high impact levers for supporting an end to the crisis, b) expected social impacts of the locust outbreak in the horn of Africa, including food security and migration, and c) an assessment of areas most vulnerable to sociopolitical instability, conflict, and forced displacement as a result of water scarcity. These areas of research have so far resulted in the creation of a second major program area for 2021: Supporting community organizations and associated policy development in the Lake Chad Basin region, where communities are already suffering greatly from the impacts of climate change induced water scarcity. We expect additional program develop to follow as funding permits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.7%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.6%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 52.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.7% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $86K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.