Peace Power and Purpose Ministry Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475164759
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Franklin, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6152020379
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,287
- Expenses
- $54,107
- Assets
- $28,778
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID WILHELM (PRESIDENT/SE)
People named in this filing
- BOBBY MORGAN (DIRECTOR)
- HAL CONDITT (DIRECTOR)
- DAVID WILHELM (PRESIDENT/SE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Putting god's love into action by empowering people to discover and achieve their purpose through personal accountability in a judgement-free atmosphere.
What it reported doing in 2021
In 2021, peace power and purpose ministry inc (p3) held regular meetings and mentoring sessions with college college students, young adults and struggling individuals. In addition, ongoing small group meetings were held for men and young adults. P3 also worked on developing a program for an inner city high school football team.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 81% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -232.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -36.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -50.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $50K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.