Peace Place

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474206296
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Great Falls, MT, USA
Phone
4064531412
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Day Care

Reported finances

Revenue
$338,438
Expenses
$344,694
Assets
$122,926
Liabilities
$13,190

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • AMY CLURE (DIRECTOR)
  • DOUG MERCADO (DIRECTOR)
  • RANDI RAINS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of peace place is to give hope and respite to families with children who have medical and/or diverse, specialized needs. Peace place offers skilled, purposeful childcare in an inclusive setting, caregiver support, and education so at-risk children may be safe and their families may thrive.

What it reported doing in 2023

Peace place is a non-profit organization that provides free, licensed respite care to qualifying families. We call it "respite with a purpose," meaning the well-trained, compassionate caregivers at peace place make the most out of the time they have with the children. Through this, the children learn positive behavioral strategies and life skills (communication, socialization, self-regulation, executive functioning, motor skills, positive behavior reinforcement, etc.) at peace place, which they will be able to take with them into all other environments. Peace place also supports parents and families by giving them a much-needed break. In addition, we provide education, support, and coping tools to lessen their stressors at home. The purpose behind this is to prevent the abuse and neglect of children with special needs, which, unfortunately, occurs at a higher rate than in the general population. Morning program (ages 0 - 5): trained caregivers provide "respite with a purpose" to children five days a week for three hours. Using all safety precautions and proven educational and behavioral techniques, our caregivers facilitate social skills, self-regulation, communication skills, creative learning, and executive functioning skills. The caregivers help children to master these skills during the program, so they can begin to generalize these skills across every environment. The parent receives a break, as well as tools to help their child. Mid-day program (ages 0-12): designed for children with more intense medical needs, require more behavioral support, or children who have a higher level of sensory sensitivity, this program will have a higher staff-to-child ratio, so staff has the ability to work with a child on a one-to-one basis. After-school program (ages 5-12+): following the school day, trained caregivers provide "respite with a purpose" to this age group, as well. After a long day of structure, focus, and sitting at a desk, these kids are ready to work out their energy, engage in physical activity, think creatively, and re-regulate. Participation in the after-school program is designed to help kids return to a more relaxed, regulated state before they go home, making for a less stressful environment for the entire family. Summer camps (ages 5-12+): these camps are focused on keeping school-age children with special needs engaged and participating in constructive programs, thus giving parents opportunities for respite in the summer months. Peace place provides six different camps during the summer, including two art camps, two nature camps, a back-to-school bootcamp and a kindergarten-ready bootcamp. The bootcamps are a recent addition and are designed to help children with specialized needs who struggle with acclimating to school in the fall. They begin the process of increasing focus and attention, building endurance, practicing self-regulation, and engaging in executive functioning skills before the school year begins. The goal is to relieve stress in the children, their families, and their educators. Parent programs include a monthly circle of parents support group that incorporates education and an open discussion among parents to encourage sharing of resources and social connections, and individual parent trainings, as needed. Every program at peace place is designed to improve the lives of vulnerable children with specialized needs and their families, wrapping them in a blanket of support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.9%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 76.5%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.9% of revenue deployed · 76.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $264K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.