Peace for Paws Ohio Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452978258
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Dublin, OH, USA
Phone
8778295500
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,737
Expenses
$13,921
Assets
$3,510
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATIE SCHOLL (PRESIDENT)
  • DR KRISTIN HAUMSCHILD DVM (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KATIE SCHOLL (PRESIDENT)
  • NADINE PECHAR (TREASURER)
  • DR KRISTIN HAUMSCHILD DVM (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Assist with homeless pet overpopulation in Ohio by providing education and financial support for spay and neuter efforts, financing shelter rescue fees, organizing basic veterinary care, facilitating transportation for companion animals scheduled to be euthanized, providing temporary pet food assistance for rescue groups and organizing public outreach programs to promote the humane treatment of animals and fundraise and solicit funds to support such efforts.

What it reported doing in 2024

Pet adoption program - the organization accepts homeless dogs from high-kill shelters and places them in foster care. While in foster care, each dog receives necessary medical treatment, including but not limited to spay/neuter procedures, vaccines and microchipping. Through social media and adoption events, the foster dogs are marketed for adoption. Prior to adoption, applications are processed through a background check and home visit.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.8%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 55.1%; rating input score 55

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.8% of revenue deployed · 55.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.