Pdv Foundation Inc C/o Denise Pazur

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
562538687
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Sheboygan, WI, USA
Phone
9204574033
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Mental Health Disorders

Reported finances

Expenses
$14,663
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENISE PAZUR (PRESIDENT/SECRETARY/DIRECT)

People named in this filing

  • DENISE PAZUR (PRESIDENT/SECRETARY/DIRECT)
  • GERALD R VAN DE KREEKE (TREASURER/DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose for which the corporation is organized and operated is to advance communciations in health svcs, specifically suicide prevention.

What it reported doing in 2021

Advances prevention of suicide in America through strategic communications. Fully supportive of America's National Strategy for Suicide Prevention <http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/suicideprevention/strategy.asp> , the PDV Foundation serves as an unencumbered and independent source of facts, information and analysis for policymakers, the media, the health care community, and the public. Its product is information, and its programs present this information in ways meaningful and compelling to stakeholders in suicide prevention. The PDV Foundation transfers the latest and best data on the complex issue of suicide to stakeholders, using comprehensive, multi-platform communications strategies that include its specialized websites, eBulletins, print magazines, web seminars and more.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 4
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 81.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -43.9% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -37.7% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.