Pcx Go Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824548402
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Lithonia, GA, USA
Phone
4042196545
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,000
Expenses
$124,660
Assets
$44,060
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Erich Perrimon Thomas (co-founder/Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Erich Perrimon Thomas (co-founder/Executive Director)
  • Jakita Nicole Owensby Thomas (co-founder, Secretary, Treasurer)
  • Geraldine Perrimon Thomas (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Preparing youth for eSports careers through capacity building around eSports career pathways.

What it reported doing in 2021

- Over 500 Black and Brown youth directly served through virtual programming - Seven thousand dollars awarded to K-12 youth who won individual tournaments at the national level - Funds raised to outfit three Children's Hospitals of Atlanta locations with esports equipment and/or programming for use by the youth whom CHOA serves - Awarded scholarships to students enrolled in Morris Brown College's eSports Performance program - Trained 7 apprentices at the high school and college levels.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -183.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 152.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -103.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -95.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.