Pco Enterprises Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464795795
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
New Berlin, WI, USA
Phone
4148012084
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Job Training
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,330
Expenses
$16,470
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIM PACHOLSKI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TIM PACHOLSKI (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN PACHOLSKI (VICE PRESIDE)
  • DANIEL PACHOLSKI (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

P.co enterprises inc is organized exclusively for charitable, religious and educational purposes; for the betterment of others through the education of young men and women about handling construction and power equipment and to support the local church, and missionaries around the world so that people can learn from the scriptures and ultimately come to have eternal life through jesus christ our lord.

What it reported doing in 2017

The refurbishment and sale of construction and power equipment, the proceeds of which are used to support the local church and missionaries around the world who spread the teachings of jesus christ.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 68% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.2%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -52% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.2% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.