Pc Advocacy Initiative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
825188305
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
Phone
6146286960
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Reported finances

Expenses
$13,112
Assets
$249,153

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANQUAN BOLDIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANQUAN BOLDIN (PRESIDENT)
  • MALCOLM JENKINS (TREASURER/SE)
  • DEMARIO DAVIS (ASSISTANT SE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is organized exclusively for the promotion of social welfare within the meaning of section 501(c)(4) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "code"), or any corresponding section of any future federal tax code, by and through any lawful act or activity for which nonprofit corporations may be formed under chapter 1702 of the Ohio revised code. The specific purposes for which the corporation is organized are to ensure equality of rights of all persons and to bring about social and civic changes related to the promotion of peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all persons, in each case through operations emphasizing the areas of criminal justice reform, police community relations, and educational and economic advancement.

What it reported doing in 2024

Police & community relations, criminal justice reform, education, and economic advancement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.3% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -85.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.