Pb a Texas Non-profit Corporation Pride Baseball

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274722297
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
College Station, TX, USA
Phone
9792297618
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,168
Expenses
$66,680
Assets
$63,699
Liabilities
$72,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM M EASTERLING (OFFICER)
  • DARLA EASTERLING (OFFICER)
  • WILLIAM B EASTERLING (HEAD OF OPERATIONS)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission is to create an environment for young athletes to participate in a developmental select baseball program that focuses of quality instruction, practice, and competition. Our goal is to be a true academy where players can progress and develop. The ball-players will learn how to play the game the right way. Players will learn how to play as a team and win as a team. In order to develop their physical condition and baseball specific skills, the players will be encouraged to work hard and play even harder. The pride baseball academy will provide all the tools needed for success. This is not a "winning-at-all-costs" type of program. Individuals will learn how to play as a team before they can win as a team. Players will learn to compete through a combination of fun, sweat, and teamwork. We are here to make good ball-players better.

What it reported doing in 2023

Youth baseball program

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.3%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.9%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.13; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.3% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.