Pawtuckaway Lake Improvement Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020451995
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Nottingham, NH, USA
- Phone
- 8457971953
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,934
- Expenses
- $24,941
- Assets
- $55,145
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Duffy (President)
- Kim Gable (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Thomas Duffy (President)
- Kim Gable (Vice President)
- Pam Kelly (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Pawtuckaway Lake Improvement Association is to monitor and act upon environmental and safety issues that affect Pawtuckaway Lake, to educate the public on conservation, protection, and improvement of water quality, natural shoreline, wildlife habitat recreational resources, safety, and natural resources as they pertain to the welfare and interest of Pawtuckaway Lake.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our Lake Host program is conducted in coordination with NH Lakes. This program administers volunteer and paid lake Hosts whose responsibilities include identifying various invasive species on boats motors and trailers, removing such invasives and collect and report their findings. During the last season, inspections were conducted on over 85,000 boats. This monumental task helps prevent the spread of invasives from one lake to another, Unfortunately, an invasive plant called Milfoil has invaded Pawtuckaway Lake resulting in the need for continued monitoring and detection.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.21; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.