Pawsitive Hope Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271151829
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Canal Fulton, OH, USA
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $167,464
- Expenses
- $179,556
- Assets
- $31,846
- Liabilities
- $6,849
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACY L BRIDGES DVM (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL BRIDGES DVM (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STACY L BRIDGES DVM (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL BRIDGES DVM (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN E RODGERS (SECRETARY TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing vet care for shelter dogs
What it reported doing in 2023
Providing veterinarian care for dogs at the stark county dog warden above and beyond their spay/neuter program
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.4%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 44.2%; rating input score 44
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.2%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.4% of revenue deployed · 44.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $79K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.