PAWS San Diego County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330632209
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6192977297
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-23,644
- Expenses
- $33,752
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Richard Bockoff (President)
- Geraldine D'Silva (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Wendy Pitcher (Treasurer)
- Richard Bockoff (President)
- Debby Clark (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
PAWS San Diego preserves the human-animal bond by providing essential pet services and support to low-income seniors, chronically ill and disabled individuals.
What it reported doing in 2014
During the reporting period, the organization provided pet food, veterinary service vouchers, and pet supplies to 505 low-income elderly, chronically ill, and disabled individuals and their more than 656 companion animals. Additionally, the organization operated PAWS Pantry which provided food, supplies, treats and toys to more than 279 pets.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 8
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 20.9%; rating input score 21
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -242.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -33.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -39.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.