Paws Ranch Equine Rescue Preri

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271964906
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Bostic, NC, USA
Phone
8005806504
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$160,425
Expenses
$158,624
Assets
$160,425
Liabilities
$158,624

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michael Hanser (President)

People named in this filing

  • Michael Hanser (President)
  • Delores Hanser (Treasurer Director)
  • Ariel Campbell (Secretary Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rescue and Rehabilitation of abused or neglected equine dedicated to the compassionate care of equine PRERI is a haven where horses mules and donkeys have found a safe environment to thrive free from abuse, hunger and sadness and given a purpose and not just an existence. We provide medical care, rehabilitation and placement in adoptive forever homes for unwanted abused or neglected horses.

What it reported doing in 2013

Emergency Equine Fund, Emergency Disaster Response and Community Hay Bank. PRERI assisted local and outside law enforcement and animal control in 8 seizures and magistrate orders resulting in the intake of the horses and administered medical, rehabilitation and transportation services of the horses involved. Working with 2 animal control agencies regarding a horse and animal hoarder in Rutherford and McDowell counties 2 separate properties wilt 127 horses, 60 cows and calves and 20 dogs. This will be a ongoing project due to the scope of the situation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.1%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.99; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 72% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.1% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $128K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.