Paws of Grace Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364834759
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
King City, CA, USA
Phone
8315214425
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$113,003
Expenses
$113,570
Assets
$5,883
Liabilities
$2,940

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tammy Fuller (President)

People named in this filing

  • Tammy Fuller (President)
  • Kim Lawson (Director)
  • Montana Spraque (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Paws of Grace assists individuals with a wide range of physical and mental challenges, disorders and special needs by providing opportunities for experimental learning and healing interactions with animals, including, without limitation, wolf dogs, Bengal cats, Alpaca, Myotonic (fainting) goats, geese, peacocks and other exotic birds, as well as rescued horses. The individuals to be assisted shall include, without limitations, (i)persons who are struggling with drug or alcohol addiction; (ii)persons who have experienced trauma and are suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or general anziety disorder (GAD), such as veterans and victims of abuse and human trafficking, and (iii) persons with special needs such as children and adults with autism or affected by cerebral palsy, paraplegics and quadriplegics, or who have other mental or physical handicaps or special needs.

What it reported doing in 2020

To provide respite care for special needs individuals and at risk teens using farm animals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.7% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $102K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 1 filing year from 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.