Paws for Seniors
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454243418
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Toms Brook, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5407488177
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $143,829
- Expenses
- $139,577
- Assets
- $94,298
- Liabilities
- $1,326
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- James Scamordella (President/Treasurer/Exec Director)
- Erica Vernon (Vice President/Director)
People named in this filing
- James Scamordella (President/Treasurer/Exec Director)
- Erica Vernon (Vice President/Director)
- Brenda Scamordella (Secretary/Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Foster Based Animal Rescue and Adoption Organizaton of homeless Cats and Dogs
What it reported doing in 2024
Rescue of homeless cats and dogs, addressing their medical and psycological needs and finding them new homes to qualified adopters through our adoption process. Our adoption process consist of processing the adopters submitted online application for an animal or prequalifying which may consist of vet checks, landlord checks, home checks, and personal interviews. Once approved the animal is adopted and an adoption contract is signed. Home checks may be done virtually. We educate clients and the public on cat and dog care and handling as well as the benefit of adopting a senior rescued pet. Our full life cycle process consists of an intake process where we address the pets medical needs, facilitate required health care, behavioral, and grooming needs. We then change their status in our database system to available where they are seen by the public via internet. They are also seen by the public via adoption events, personal visits to the adopters home or the adopters may visit foster home where the animal is staying. We commit to these animals for life. If the animal does not get adopted they stay in our as a permanent foster pet. In 2024 our medical expenses alone was over 58 thousand dollars. At the beginning of 2024 we had 58 animals in foster homes. we had a total of 235 new intakes into our organization and we had 239 adoptions. 15 senior pets died or were euthanized for health reasons. Paws for Seniors only has one Program Service which consists of rescuing unfortunate animals that for many reasons lose the only home they ever knew. Most of the pets are senior cats and dogs and 80% of our human clients are senior citizens. Paws for Seniors rely solely on donations from the public to support our mission. We also charge an adoption fee which rarely covers the cost that goes into each of the animals. By the good grace of our followers and the community we are able to sustain our organization and continue to give each animal a high quality of medical care and a high quality diet. As stated previously we only have one program and all our expenses are directly or indirectly associated with our rescue mission. The Program Service Expenses below does not include Insurance, Depreciation, Asset state tax, or Salary expenses although they are all associated with our animal rescue program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.7%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 73.9%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.7% of revenue deployed · 73.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $103K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.