Paul Ramos Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814904793
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$122,244
Expenses
$48,485
Assets
$88,969

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Paul Ramos (President & Founder)

People named in this filing

  • Paul Ramos (President & Founder)
  • Jeanelle Ramos (Treasurer & Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a nonprofit organization founded in 2017 guided by the conviction that God has called us into full-time ministry. Our tax-exempt status enables us to carry out our mission and pursue our vision effectively. We are committed to serving through a variety of ministerial outreaches including conferences and humanitarian efforts across diverse areas of need. Since our founding we have remained dedicated to meeting these needs with consistent spiritual principles and values. Our tax-exempt status allows us to continue this work by addressing the spiritual emotional and practical needs of both our organization and the communities we serve.

What it reported doing in 2025

The ministry held 10 evangelistic outreaches that served the churches and public attendees. The key activities were preaching spiritual ordinances and any extra assisting activities whether for the church or attendees and this includes mentorship visitations and all other overall practices of our religious entity. The ministry served over 7,000 people through these outreaches.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.9%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 60.3%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.83; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.