Paul Jones House Preservation Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 392838979
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Rochester, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8778295500
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies & Historic Preservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $157,322
- Expenses
- $4,530
- Assets
- $152,792
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CARRIE BOLTON (PRESIDENT)
- FRANCES KISSELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- HEATHER KOWALSKI (DIRECTOR)
- MARY GOODMAN (DIRECTOR)
- CARRIE BOLTON (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The paul jones house preservation alliance was created to preserve and continue the legacy of the paul jones house. The paul jones house is one of the oldest buildings in aurora, ny and is part of a state and federal historic district. Four activities are planned by the paul jones house preservation alliance (pjhpa). Each will take about 25 percent of the directors' time and will be executed by the working directors and pjhpa members. These activities further the pjhpa purpose by engaging the public funding preservation of the building.
What it reported doing in 2025
Communication to supporters of the corporation written by the directors and local historians. Newsletters will provide invitations to upcoming events and interesting information on the history of the house, its owners, wells college, and the village of aurora's historic district. This activity will be funded by membership dues and conducted at the paul jones house using the resources of various volunteers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 92
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 2.3%; rating input score 2
- Program expense ratio: 64%; rating input score 64
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 97.1%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 33.73; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 2.3% of revenue deployed · 64% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.