Patriot Voices Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455336275
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Spring City, PA, USA
Phone
8555740850
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$738,558
Expenses
$647,727
Assets
$162,260
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nadine B Maenza (Director, President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Nadine B Maenza (Director, President): $72,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Organization's mission is to mobilize citizens to support public policies that reinforce America's founding principles.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, Patriot Voices continued to be a leader in advocating for working family policy. We have been a leader advocating for a conservative approach to paid family leave after the birth or adoption of a new child and expanding the Child Tax Credit. We have also helped to organize and run a conservative coalition dedicated to these issues. Patriot Voices has created educational materials and has run advocacy campaigns to build support for these issues and working together in a bipartisan way to support families. We also developed a pro-family coalition dedicated to empowering parents to keep their children safe online. We continue to be a strong voice in support of pro-life policies, including supporting our grassroots members working for pro-life policies in state legislatures in addition to Congress. We support religious freedom in the United States and globally, pressing the U.S. Government to elevate religious freedom as part of foreign policy. We continue to support Christians, Yazidis, and other religious minorities in the Middle East and globally, including the Uyghurs in China and the Rohingyas in Burma. We ran an advocacy campaign in favor of U.S. support for the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria because of their remarkable religious freedom.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 55
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.7%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $190.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.3%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.7% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $552K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 3 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $303K reported
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.