Patriot Resilient Leader Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464105905
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-PF 2019
Location
Gilford, NH, USA
Phone
6035282920
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$404,935
Expenses
$416,371
Assets
$423,194
Liabilities
$18,438

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ED HARRINGTON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ED HARRINGTON (PRESIDENT)
  • FRED HENRY (VICE PRESIDE)
  • ALYSSA MOSHER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We leverage the scenic outdoors of the New Hampshire lakes region to improve the physical, social, mental, and emotional well-being of military service members, military veterans, first responders, and their families. We facilitate outdoor experiential learning activities, life skills training classes, along with peer-to-peer counseling opportunities, in order to enable and empower participant resilience and well-being. Additionally, we prepare and encourage participants to positively impact their home communities throughout new england.

What it reported doing in 2024

The patriot resilient leadership institute (prli), widely known as camp resilience, proudly hosts no-cost, transformative retreats for veterans, first responders, and their families across the greater new england region. These three- to four-day experiences offer a unique blend of experiential learning, peer support, and facilitated programming, all designed to foster healing, renewal, and personal growth. Camp resilience retreats create a safe and supportive environment where participants can rediscover their inner strength, mental resilience, and sense of purpose. Against the stunning backdrop of New Hampshire's purple mountains, attendees find not only solace and serenity, but also a renewed sense of camaraderie and connection with those who understand their journey. In 2024, the camp resilience team successfully hosted 16 retreats, positively impacting the lives of over 218 participants. These included specialized programs for veterans, first responders, military and veteran couples, families, and equine-assisted learning experiences. Each retreat is thoughtfully tailored to the unique needs of its participants, ensuring both personal relevance and meaningful outcomes. Camp resilience remains steadfast in its mission: to empower those who have served, on the battlefield and at home, to bounce back and improve in mind, body, and spirit, as well as thrive in all aspects of life.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.4%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 78%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.8%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.4% of revenue deployed · 78% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $325K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.