Patriot Oil Community Benefit Trust Fund of 2002
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 356739129
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Granada Hills, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8183633597
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,293
- Expenses
- $127,673
- Assets
- $597,530
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WAYDE HUNTER (President)
People named in this filing
- ELIZABETH MITEV (Trustee)
- WAYDE HUNTER (President)
- BILL COTTER (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary purpose of the POCBT2002 is to fund worthy projects that will protect, enhance, beautify, educate, reward or be of general benefit to the residents in the area within its established boundaries.The North Valley Coalitions Board (NVC) acting as the POCBT2002 funds Board will decide the merits and final amounts of any request by residents, community organizations, schools and parks located within its boundaries including any other organization or City and County departments that directly services, benefits or have a nexus with that area (i.e. fire & police).
What it reported doing in 2025
Program Service AccomplishmentsPARKS We did not fund any major projects this year for the City of Los Angeles Recreation & Parks Department (R&P) although we were in discussion with them to undertake a number of restoration projects in Bee and OMelveny Canyon Parks. SCHOOLS (LAUSD) We funded the Van Gogh Elementary School 5th Grade fund raising shortfall so that they could take their field trip. COMMUNITY/SAFETY AWARENESS - The Granada Hills Youth Recreation Center (GHYREC) was our major project this year assisting them in making the City required ADA compliant improvements in their parking area. As a second major project, we provided substantial funding to Supporters of Law Enforcement in Devonshire (S.O.L.I.D) to renovate the LAPD Gang & Narcotics Unit offices. Provided funding for the LAPD Devonshire PALS for the Youth Center Agriculture Program to help them with supplies. We provided funding for the Granada Hills Community Foundation to create a Centennial Website to celebrate the 100-year Anniversary of the founding of Granada Hills. Provided funding to the Southern California Preparedness Foundation to fund CERT classes in Granada Hills. Also provided additional funding as a Diamond Sponsor for the Oktoberfest 2025 fund raising project but limited it to Hope of the Valley, M.E.N.D, S.O.L.I.D. V.F.W 2323 organizations that support our Granada Hills area. Provided additional funding to the Granada Hills Chamber of Commerces Street Faire 2025 and continue to be a Platinum Sponsor of their year-end Holiday Parade 2025 by funding the judges and the trophies. Although we have previously funded the kitchen remodel, the roof repair and the patio restoration , we again came to the rescue of the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW 2323) by providing funding to purchase an ice machine and the cost of one-half of a new roof mounted air conditioner. We were a Platinum Sponsor for North Valley YMCAs Thanksgiving Baskets 2025 program to assist needy families over the holiday in the Granada Hills area. MISCELLANEOUS - We continued to allow the Granada Hills Chamber of Commerce to maintain a $9,000 fund in 2025 to be used should the City start charging for the cost of traffic control related to the Holiday Parade, with our guarantee to replenish the fund to $18,000 fund should it become necessary. We continue to provide limited free storage space at our Community Storage Unit for organizations such as the Valley Disaster Preparedness Team for their documents and supplies, and documents for the SCL CAC, which service our Trusts area, as well as to community members who have land use documents or letters that are being disposed of but are worthy of saving for posterity. We also continue to loan three 4-drawer file cabinets to the Granada Hills North Neighborhood Council (GHNNC). We also have 13 x 13 and 10 x 10 popup canopies that we loan out to any local worthy organization for events upon request.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.6%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 84.1%; rating input score 84; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -71.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.68; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $126K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.