Patrick Animal Welfare Society Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 542012240
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Stuart, VA, USA
- Phone
- 2766942378
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,947
- Expenses
- $24,672
- Assets
- $57,155
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MURPHY BROWN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MURPHY BROWN (PRESIDENT)
- BRENDA SIMS (TREASURER)
- DAVID SHELLEY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This corporation is organized to sponsor, promote, participate and encourage interest in the welfare, health and life of all animals; and to that end to conduct exhibitions, educational programs, and all things of like nature, including community outreach whether devoted to a specific animal or not, and in general to promote the humane treatment of all animals as permitted by law. This corporation is committed to securing funds to assist the community to spay and neuter in an attempt to control pet over population and reduce the practice of euthanasia. Our commitment extends to the rescue of animals in need, and fostering them until placement into a good home or facility. No animal shall be sold or given away for research or experimentation or for any other purpose than as a pet, companion, and/or service animal.
What it reported doing in 2020
The patrick animal welfare society inc. Promotes animal spay and adoption services in patrick county and surrounding areas. .
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.1%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -175.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.32; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.