Patient-centered Primary Care Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262012436
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2024172074
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,266,798
- Expenses
- $2,318,034
- Assets
- $2,651,285
- Liabilities
- $1,604,085
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANN GREINER (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ANN GREINER (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $325,412 total reported compensation
- LARRY MCNEELY (POLICY DIRECTOR): $153,712 total reported compensation
- THOMAS DIDIER (SENIOR COMMUNICATIONS MANA): $135,347 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The patient-centered primary care foundation, d/b/a primary care collaborative (pcc), works to unify and engage its diverse stakeholders, including public and private organizations including physician and nursing groups, patient and consumer organizations, health plan, employers, industry, quality organizations, health systems and others, to promote polities and share best practices that support the growth of high-performing primary care and achieve the "quadruple aim": better care, better health lower costs, and greater joy for clinicians and staff in delivery of care.
What it reported doing in 2025
Member services - pcc provides member support through engaging in policy and advocacy efforts to allocate the resources needed for advanced primary care and ensure consumer access to such care; sponsoring affinity groups, policy convenings, and membership-engagement events; and informing members about payment, delivery, and benefit innovations, as well as other evidence, related to advanced primary care through webinars, publications, newsletters, and pcc's website
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.3%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.5%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.3% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $325K · 16 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.