Pathways Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800194110
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2009
- Forms available
- Form 990 2009
- Location
- Danbury, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2037911180
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Primary, Elementary Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $399,400
- Expenses
- $380,634
- Assets
- $84,319
- Liabilities
- $1,353
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Corporation is organized exclusively for educational purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3)to transform the lives of at-risk boys in the Danbury community by providing a Christ-centered education alternative that develops self-excellence, and emotional/spiritual maturity.
What it reported doing in 2009
The core program provides for private school education for boys in Middle School (grades 6 through 8). The system design calls for admission in the sixth grade and retention through the eight grade. In 2008-2009, the initial academic year, there was an enrollment of 10 students at the 6th grade level. In the 2009-2010 academic year, this enrollment expanded with the admission of the members of the new 6th grade class as well as the additional members of the class rising to 7th grade.During the 09-10 school year, Pathways Academy completed the integration of an Honors curriculum for the 7th grade, implemented a student government program and organized a middle school basketball program for competitions with other area middle schools and club teams.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 40
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $234K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $14K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.