Pathway to Fitness

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861484380
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Rio Linda, CA, USA
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,174
Expenses
$62,374
Assets
$51,136

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Benjamin Alderman (Vice President)
  • Stefanie Alderman (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Benjamin Alderman (Vice President)
  • Bonnie Hemness (Secretary)
  • Amber Huber (CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Overcome Project is dedicated to empowering opportunity youth through the development of free state of the art youth facilities with a focus on health and fitness. Our mission at The Overcome Project is to provide a safe and nurturing environment for individuals in communities facing socio-economic challenges. We are commitment to addressing health disparities and inequities to ensure the thriving of our kids. Building relationships in sport and play gives us the opportunity to build bridges in our communities. Our approach also involves enhancing job prospects and skills for young adults thereby reducing drug sales and restricting access to harmful substances. We aim to shift cultural norms and perspectives to equip youth for inevitable pressures and empower them to make informed choices regarding substance use. The Overcome Project heart is to build men and women of good character by showing unconditional love and support through creating a strong foundation across our locations

What it reported doing in 2025

We have also been allowed to take our program into group homes for kids that are at a high risk for self harm or are being currently monitored for this.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.6%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.2%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 86.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -41.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.