Pathway for Immigrant Workers

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882441074
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Cambridge, MA, USA
Phone
6179415230
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Personal Social Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$180,232
Expenses
$95,440
Assets
$107,218
Liabilities
$4,046

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Leslie Ditrani (Executive Director/Director)
  • Annelise Araujo (President/Director)

People named in this filing

  • Leslie Ditrani (Executive Director/Director)
  • Annelise Araujo (President/Director)
  • Alejandro Epstein-Santoyo (Treasurer/Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the corporation is to assist low-income workers in obtaining lawful permanent residence and related legal stability, and to support employers in recruiting and retaining a stable, lawfully authorized workforce that sustains economic vitality, and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a nonprofit corporation may be organized under the laws of Massachusetts consistent with the Code.

What it reported doing in 2025

We have provided more than 2,000 assessments, trained 242 attorneys, presented 85 seminars, and have a caseload of approximately 160 cases. Donated services from the Executive Director, volunteer and work study law clerks were $100,000.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47.2%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 45.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 57.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 90.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47.2% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.