Pathologists Overseas
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330523930
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2011, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2534447618
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $255,718
- Expenses
- $106,043
- Assets
- $166,472
- Liabilities
- $2,452
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Emily Glynn (Board of Directors President)
People named in this filing
- Emily Glynn (Board of Directors President)
- Tim Amukele (Board Secretary Treasurer)
- Jack Ladenson (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pathologists Overseas mission is to improve health care by building accurate accessible and enduring diagnostic services in resource-limited areas and to foster an international community of pathologists and laboratory professionals dedicated to strengthening health worldwide through reliable systems training and quality assurance.
What it reported doing in 2024
The PaLMEd program expands access to free high-quality continuing education for pathologists and laboratory professionals in low- and middle-income countries. The program helps strengthen laboratory systems and improve the accuracy and reliability of results through knowledge transfer in key areas of pathology and laboratory practice management and leadership. Through digital platforms and our global volunteer network Pathologists Overseas provide multilingual pre-recorded and live training sessions that make learning accessible interactive and sustainable. In settings where internet access is limited our on demand content allows learners to study at their own pace while live sessions promote discussion and engagement. In FY 2024 we partnered with Fundacion Garrahan to hold a Spanish-language laboratory quality management systems course for anatomic pathologists in Latin America. This course included 18 hours of lecture and small group discussion content. We received 72 registrants from 7 countries in Central and South America and the Caribbean.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.9%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $40.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 58.5%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.57; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.9% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $83K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.