PAST Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311694479
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, US
- Phone
- 6143401208
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Humanities Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,229,094
- Expenses
- $3,647,130
- Assets
- $6,294,353
- Liabilities
- $2,580,678
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISA SWARTZWELDER (PRESIDENT &)
People named in this filing
- DENNIS AIG (MEMBER)
- ANNALIES CORBIN (FOUNDER & CE)
- NICK D'ANGELO (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
By Partnering Anthropology with Science and Technology (PAST), we design and deliver real-world learning experiences that prepare students and educators for the future of work.
What it reported doing in 2025
Summer bridge programs: the past bridge programs offer an array of exciting projects that students, adults, teachers and partners can become involved in. The projects are structured for both day and overnight throughout the summer months. Each program targets a specific audience and is structured to meet the needs of participants. Over the past ten years, past programs have evolved into bridge programs as the past foundation team strives to build programs that use the world as schoolroom, immerse students in learning and have real outcomes. Bridge programs stand apart from concept to implementation. The term bridge is a way to help students move from one way of thinking or one level of thinking to the next. The programs provide the bridge reinforcing critical thinking and exposing students to at least three levels of problem-based learning. Bridge program success is derived from several years of planning, scaling, testing and defining real world issues and partnerships with engaging education. There are four vital components of the bridge program: real issues, real partners, a transdisciplinary approach and a polished presentation of learning following the traditional cycle of design principles used in all scientific methodologies. Using bridge program structure the past foundation touches hundreds of life long learners each year. Each program has its own unique qualities and activities. Each program has a practical goal and set of presentations. Each program reaches out to the public in real time through social networking and later through podcast. Ethnographic knowledge capture: past provides embedded anthropologists for continuous study & analysis to evolve stem educational reform. Understanding local culture is critical to successful educational reform. Ethnographic knowledge capture coalesces the community voices relecting common threads of understanding and unique community prespectives informing decision making and revealing bottlenecks in the system so that they can be addressed. Culturally relevant educational design connects students and teachers with local community and industry. Ethnographic knowledge capture helps in planning and partnering so that the underlying systems reflect the entire community and are as robust as possible. Anthropology provides avenues for real-time and agile course correction that is key to program growth and sustained success. Stem school design and implementation: stem provides an approach to learning that allows students of all ages to explore and examine real world issues holistically. Using the tried and true design principles of scientific methods as a vehicle, while bringing many disciplines to bear on a question, links learning to life. Combining a transdisciplinary approach that de-silos education with stem design principles addressing real world issues enable past to partner with teachers, schools, communities and industry to build programs that are engaging and sustainable. Past has partnered with schools around the world in building programs that: address real issues, are aligned to educational standards, continue to grow, are sustainable, and have real outcomes. Strong programs require a set of partners from industry, higher education, pk-12, and the community. Employing teachers as fundamental partners, past anthropologists are able to build strong cohorts that are supported through consistent professional development within a well-structured system that can be scaled and sustained. Partnering with higher education, industry and the community these collaboratives provide students and teachers with deep content expertise and access to current research and support. Utilizing technology, past is able to spur inquiry and broaden the reach of all programs. Past helps teachers, schools and communities build programs that transform educational systems into 21st century learning centers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -63.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 12 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.